Comment: WAA LOOK, VERY FRESH BULLETS
Author: Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
Date: 2010-07-07 20:07:22
Comment to: LISTEN TO THIS DUNDERHEAD.
To: Justice Sarpong, Houston, Texas.
WAA LOOK, VERY FRESH BULLETS
Sarpong, I know I am being hard on you, and I like it very much because you deserve it. The good part of this is that there has been a huge improvement in your writings. I have to admit this. You still have a long way to go, though. I want to let others know what I know and you know to be a fact: you are a charlatan.
Each time this charlatan writes bullets flow waa waaa like water. He claims an MBA and what he calls, a "selective" in Economics. Look at the mess of an argument and tell me if you can believe this. Even in the apio bars, poor Ghanaian illiterates under the influence of alcohol, in addition to old age and family troubles, argue more intelligently than this. The article is also revealingly spiced by a painful array of grammatical weaknesses of the author, which do not seem to go away no matter how hard he tries. In order to hide this handicap and a panic reaction at damage control, as a result of any exposure, he would rather go into archives and a doomed attempt to resurrect extraneous issues to cover up his shame. I never give up as I keep pointing out new ones and very demonstrably fresh, and on this very same page for all to see:
"the two parties [is] assumed to benefit"
AS IN: "In any contract negotiations, the two parties [is] assumed to benefit by bringing something to the table, what is Korea STX bringing to the table"
HOMEWORK:
Writ: "the two parties [ARE] assumed to benefit" 100 TIMES, REPEAT AFTER MEALS
"purchases that [is] coming from"
AS IN: "We are giving STX free land, tax free material purchases that [is] coming from Korea and 100% repatriation of its profit."
HOMEWORK:
Write "purchases that [ARE] coming from" 100 TIMES, REPEAT AFTER MEALS
"before Parliament even [debate] on it."
AS IN: We've seen the Vice President of Korea... officials from Korea [trouping] in and out of Ghana meeting NDC officials to 'consumate' this contract before Parliament even [debate] on it.
HOMEWORK:
Write: "before Parliament even [DEBATES] on it." 100 TIMES, REPEAT AFTER MEALS.
"NDC is bent on selling ... and it [had] closed its mind"AS IN: "NDC is bent on selling ... and it [had] closed its mind to listen to anybody in Ghana"
HOMEWORK:
Write: "NDC is bent on selling ... and it [HAS] closed its mind" 100 TIMES, REPEAT AFTER MEALS.
I shall cool it down for you a little bit if you humbly acknowledge these bullets, as all normal scholars do when they slip and not behave like the thug that you are. You are nothing but a thug, that is not welcome here, and that is what I want to expose. Please come and confirm what I have just said, or prove me wrong, before you dare to comment again on the contributions of people you disagree with, under the yoke of your struggling grammar.
Sincerely,
THE SARPONGLISH
Blog: /sarponglish.blogspot.com/
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SARPONGLISH,
Blog: /sarponglish.blogspot.com/,
Posted by Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro, Editor-In-Chief, STAY ON TOP OF THE LATEST SARPONGNESE IN TOWN: Already a member? Sign in, Follow THE SARPONGLISH, with Google Friend Connect, Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
THE SARPONGLISH, Share with friends on facebook! Spread the word: Sarpong is full of shit! You squeeze him at your own risk! JUST READ HOW MUCH I CAN GET UNDER HIS SKIN AFTER THIS POST.
Thursday, July 8, 2010,
Blog: /sarponglish.blogspot.com/,
NDC is bent on selling our future to the Korean STX conglomerate by mortgaging our oil revenue as a guarantee to secure loans for STX ship building company WHOSE EXPERIENCE IN HOMEBUILDING is not impressive and putative and it [had] closed its mind to listen to anybody in Ghana because it has a vested [interest this] contract, it is doing all it can to see that, it goes through.
In any contract negotiations, the two parties [is] assumed to benefit by bringing something to the table, what is Korea STX bringing to the table? EXPERTISE? They are not bringing any financing because the government of Ghana is guaranteeing the 10 billion dollars loan with our oil revenue for the next twenty years. Can't we guarantee this loan for our local companies to undertake this project? We are giving STX free land, tax free material purchases that [is] coming from Korea and 100% repatriation of its profit.
STX is also going to bring a lot of unemployed Koreans, both Professionals and casual laborers to undertake this project depriving Ghanaians thousands of jobs that could have helped to reduce our unemployment figures. The Koreans have appropriated to themselves 40% of all jobs going to be created by this project.
One has to ask himself or herself, why is the Korean government so interested in trying to secure this project for a private STX company that is cash strapped? This is because this contract helps the Korean economy more than it does for our economy. We've seen the Vice President of Korea and other government officials from Korea [trouping] in and out of Ghana meeting NDC officials to 'consumate' this contract before Parliament even [debate] on it.
If the government of Ghana has to pledge 10 billion dollars to secure a loan for a Korean company that is going to buy 100% of the materials needed to do this project without paying any tax and then repatriate 100% of its income back to Korea without being taxed, then why is the [goverment] not using its oil clout to secure this loan for local real estate companies to undertake this project instead of the Korean STX? Are the Koreans better in building houses for Ghanaians than our own real estate companies?
What is in this contract for NDC that the government is not listening to the electorate? This contract is going to be approved by the majority NDC members in Parliament and the only option left for Ghanaians is to have a massive demonstration against this contract and the opposition members in Parliament boycotting Parliament to deny NDC the quorum needed to debate on this contract.
No comments:
Post a Comment